breathoflight: (♕ suiting up)
ᔕnow ᙡhite ([personal profile] breathoflight) wrote2013-05-13 12:24 am

♕ 003 video/spam

[Warden Filter]

I have noticed an increase in talks about building a better sense of community here on the Barge as of late. It's certainly not a bad conversation to have because regardless of whether or not a particular individual is a warden or an inmate, we are responsible for ourselves and for one another.

For that to happen, I believe we as wardens need to take a look at ourselves. Our main focus is, of course, the inmates. Different reasons have brought us here, but regardless of our motivations, the rehabilitation of the inmates is our top priority. To do that best, we need to be at our best. I do not mean to say that mistakes cannot happen, but rather that we must rely on one another for our care as we do to care for the inmates. Truthfully, I have not been here long enough to assess the support in place, but I worry we are not taking care of ourselves enough.

That said, I also wonder if perhaps there is a way to include the inmates in such a system, to encourage a healthy and better sense of camaraderie with everyone on board. I know not every inmate deserves the same amount of trust or input necessarily given their current states and the recent wrongs they have committed, but I think more inclusion could greatly benefit relations between everyone regardless of their status.

It may seem hypocritical of me to propose this only to the wardens for now, but we are the ones with the power to institute these changes.

I just ask that everyone reflect upon this and please offer any opinion you may have.

[She cuts the feed there.]

[Spam]

[If anybody needs to talk to Snow in person, she'll be in the chapel. She's thinking/praying, but don't hesitate to interrupt. She'll gladly converse with you. c:]
surfaceshine: (Closed Circle)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-05-18 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
As for including everyone in the discussion - good luck. Even more luck having to do with punishments. I don't think it's a bad idea, necessarily, but wardens get a bit tetchy with their inmates and all.

The last - what, like a sport or something? We've got movie nights going here and there.
surfaceshine: (Ya rly)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-05-28 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not about padding egos. It's about closing ranks. This is just a group of people - wardens, inmates, whatever, some people are team players and some people don't want anything to do with anything else.

Not saying it's right, not saying don't try, I'm just saying don't make the title "warden" mean more'n it does.

They tried to get baseball started in the CES for a while. There's a basketball hoop in the gym. Plenty-a space on the deck. What kinda tournaments?
surfaceshine: (Smirking Smile)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-05-30 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh, yeah, plus no horses.

There's always gambling. That's no-contact.
surfaceshine: (Pleasantly Surprised)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-04 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
You've never played poker or pool, then.

There's dice, too.

[He cheats at two out of three.]
surfaceshine: (Smirk)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-07 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
No contact allowed, sometimes they're played in teams, there's tournaments and shit, and... it's pretty impossible to cheat at pool, but poker's pretty much got it built into the rules.

[At least, the versions Dean plays.]
surfaceshine: (Smirking Smile)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-10 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Of course. Anything worth doing does.
surfaceshine: (Shmrug!)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-12 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think treating them like the people they're going to encounter back out in the world are saints is a good alternative, no.

You're being very close-minded about the value in learning how to identify when others are cheating, and knowing how to cheat them right back.
surfaceshine: (Research)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-16 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
That depends on how it goes down.

But mostly I'm interested in knowing about it.
surfaceshine: (Doubt)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-18 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
On who it is, what they're doing, and why. If it's someone honestly trying to screw me over, then yeah, I'm gonna screw 'em back if I can.

If it's just someone messing with me, well. I still like to know.
surfaceshine: (Unimpressed)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-21 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I...




Are you messin' with me?
surfaceshine: (Puzzled)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-22 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
You seriously don't know why it would be different if someone was out to actively fuck you over as opposed to just being bored?
surfaceshine: (Ya rly)

[ Filter ]

[personal profile] surfaceshine 2013-06-28 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't say anything about retaliation - although now you mention it, I'm pretty okay with it, sometimes.

But I always prefer to know when someone is about to screw me over, so at the very least I can get out of the way.